|
![Extraordinary Rendition]()
Extraordinary Rendition (2007)
IMDB rating: 5.90
Plot: A man is abducted from the streets of London and transported via secret flights to an unknown country. Held in solitary confinement and cut off from the outside world, he is plunged into a lawless nightmare of detention without trial, interrogation and torture. Returned without explanation to the UK many months later, he is left to pick up the pieces of a shattered life in a world he no longer recognises.
|
look at
Directors:
Actors: Berdouni Omar,Serkis Andy,Yuill Jimmy,Ross Hugh,Aslam Ehti,Bartlett Nick,Doorgasingh Emilio,Ghadami Davood,Hilmi Rami,Ireland Luke,Khairdin Munir,Kostic Goran,Lindsay Angus,McDevitt Roddy,Mikic Aleksandar,Drama,Thriller,
Should Bush & Cheney be executed for their war crimes?
Or just put in prison for life? The crimes:
1. Lying about the reason for going to war in Iraq, to the Congress and the American people. They said Iraq had WMDs and there was plenty of evidence presented to that idea, no WMDs were found. They then changed the purpose of the war saying it was about Iraqi freedom. Liars.
2. Launching an aggressive war against a nation that posed no immediate threat to our sovereignity. This is against international laws of war established after WWII.
3. Authorizing illegal warantless wiretaps of American citizens. They admitted they did this one, so it’d be a very easy, and serious conviction.
4. Permitting "extraordinary rendition" (read: kidnapping) of suspected terrorists from one foreign nation to another for the purpose of torture and interrogation. Violations both of the sovereignity of the nation from which they were kidnapped, and both international and domestic laws prohibiting torture.
5. Authorizing our own government to torture suspects. Also against domestic and international law.
6. Ignoring the Habeus Corpus laws protecting people in American custody from unjust detention, along with our rights afforded by the Bill of Rights to a fair and speedy trial, access to an attorney, access to charges brought against us, no cruel or unusual punishment, etc. etc. etc. see Jose Padilla for a prime example of this illegal denial.
So, you’re the jury and in the punishment phase, do you say Execute em, or life in prison.
Those are the only 2 choices, neocons 
(I know I’ll get a lot of apologists on this one, but please limit it to these 2 choices) kthx
dt, blow me.
Liberal asskicker until you grow the stones to stop bypassing your ability to be banned or reported through your obvious glitching (try clicking on his name… "not found" hah) I don’t want to hear any more from you, idiot.
USAfisnu, you don’t know what you’re talking about. Obviously. Did we charge all Nazi soldiers with war crimes? Obviously you’d (well hopefully) agree with me that Hitler’s invasion of Europe was illegal and immoral.
Terran it’s you neocon idiots that have said we have tolerance.. I have no tolerance for idiots like you, or war criminals like your God King George W. Bush. STFU
Jesse, quite right, I suppose they don’t all fall under war crimes… some of these gross crimes were against Americans as well
Nightwind, I haven’t compared IQ scores with public figures (as if that’d be relevant anyway) but I certainly have seen a number of public calls from people with more education than I have to prosecute Bush, as well as many people from other nations.
No, just force them to listen to right wing hate radio 24 hours a day.
A Big Dick | Jan 12, 2010
STFU
d t | Jan 12, 2010
Typical zombie.
You can’t bring charges based on fantasies you read at the Huffington Post.
Liberal AssKicker | Jan 12, 2010
I would say yes, but after a trial
however we dont need one when Cheney readily admits to breaking the law
Dave87gn | Jan 12, 2010
Zzzzzzzzz
Teleprompter Messiah | Jan 12, 2010
i’d certainly like to see an investigation. i’m against the death penalty though, so it’d be life imprisonment.
i think you're an idiot! | Jan 12, 2010
Hell no… have a nice evening!
Pax Romana | Jan 12, 2010
Since there has been no trial I would say you are putting the cart before the horse
hardwoodrods | Jan 12, 2010
No send them to Gitmo instead.
Jx2-57 | Jan 12, 2010
Do you realize that if they are convicted of war crimes then all those troops under them who followed orders and carried out the war you claim is illegal would be subject to war crime convictions also?
What do you have against servicemen and veterans?
USAFisnumber1 | Jan 12, 2010
YOU NEED TO CUT BACK ON THE KOOL AIDE, IT IS MESSING UP YOUR BRAIN
DONALD T | Jan 12, 2010
no
"Stonewall" Buster 2.0 | Jan 12, 2010
Why don’t you just move on dude - deal in the now.
Bush ain’t gonna be prosecuted or thrown in jail, and definitely not executed. Think of the precedent it sets. Should they have prosecuted FDR for what he did to the Japanese Americans? Or Lincoln for also suspending Habeus Corpus in Maryland and throwing elected officials into jail without charging them? Why don’t you let your hate go, and concentrate on fixing our America.
Mathew | Jan 12, 2010
MORE LIBERAL TOLERANCE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Terran | Jan 12, 2010
Don’t worry, God has plans for them.
Mike Hawk | Jan 12, 2010
Another Liberal TROLL question.
Altair 1 | Jan 12, 2010
You would have to add Johnson, Truman, Rosevelt, Wilson, Lincoln, Madison and Washington to your list.
Phoenix | Jan 12, 2010
I am also against the death penalty, but prison is too good for the alleged criminals.
debbie | Jan 12, 2010
No, liberals need to run the government they were elected to run, work on important things like the ECONOMY, we had 8 years of Bush, now it appears we are doomed to 4 years of blaming Bush, we ( the people) don’t care about stupid, silly liberal political games , we don’t care about Bush, we want Obama to DO HIS JOB and QUIT whining about Bush, if he can’t do the job, step down and let Bush back in, at least Bush didn’t blame Clinton for everything*************************************************************************************
DukeofDixie | Jan 12, 2010
1. I really don’t think they were lying per se. I think other people were lying to them because that’s what they wanted. George Tenant and his "slam dunk" come to mind.
2. You can easily make that argument.
3. These aren’t war crimes, but against national law. And, to my knowledge were stopped upon the orders of Federal Courts - so its questionable whether, with their briefs from fascists like the Korean-American from Yale whose name completely slips my mind, they may have an argument against breaking national law - as long as it stopped when the federal courts ordered it.
4. This is either a war crime or a violation of the Geneva Conventions.
5. Agreed
6. Once again not a war crime as it only violates national law.
Unfortunately, charging an American with a war crime is impossible. There are no longer any ad hoc war crimes tribunals. They would be handled by the ICC, to which the US is not a party.
Jesse | Jan 12, 2010
People much smarter than you have tried to consider the accusation and have determined there is no bases. I could shoot down every one of your ignorant accusations but why bother, you wouldn’t listen to them anyways.
Because if you were thorough and diligent, you’d know that Bush gave 5 to 6 reasons for going to war. Yes, the main one being WMD’s and if you haven’t kept up with reality, Iraq had chemical weapons, had the capability of biological…are we really suppose to wait for them to develope nuclear capabilities before we acted ? With the mass burial graves in thier lands, with the disappearing people, 2nd class citizen treatment and honor killings of women, the human rights violations of gassing the Kurds on the northern boarder NOT to mention the loss of thier sovereignty due to invading Kuwait and refulsing to meet the 15 UN councils requirements ? It was the loss of this sovereignty and disregard to meet requirements that gave us the green light to go into the country. So go whine elsewhere, the USA gave the UN back its credibility since the UN was too much of a paper tiger to do what they promised it would. Read the resolution yourself before you come to an international forum and talk smack.
Nightwind | Jan 12, 2010
How about Lincoln for suspending the Constitution and going to war with his own citizens?
Maybe FDR for tanking the whole world economy and allowing the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor as an excuse for going to war in Europe?
JFK for playing kingmaker in Southeast Asia and starting our military escapades in Vietnam?
LBJ for escalating the conflict?
Jimmy Carter for leaving Americans to twist in the wind in Iran?
Bill Clinton for attacking pharmaceutical factories in the Middle East?
…and the wheel keeps on turning.
Ron Obvious | Jan 12, 2010
Powered bij FireStats